This October, the Spanish Air Force has completed the 60th Forward Air Controller course taught to our Armed Forces personnel. Thus continues the tradition that began in the twenties with the tactics of "the chain" that were used in the Rif. Other less traditional forces in the field, have also begun to conduct such courses among its units. This is the case of the Swedish Air Force. USMC Aviators, along with Swedish Air Force counterparts, conducted this august an introduction to Forward Air Controller (Airborne) operations and Close Air Support for the first time in SwAF history, on Malmen Military Base, Linköping, Sweden.
“This is a brand-new profile for us; we’ve never done this before,” said SwAF Maj. Stefan Engström, the FAC(A) program manager, SwAF JAS-39 Gripen Operations, Tactics and Evaluations division. “We are learning how to integrate fires and integrate operations between ground and air units.”
Marine aviation instructors from Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One, Yuma, Ariz., introduced FAC (A) and CAS concepts, tactics, and procedures for evaluation into the Swedish Air Force’s aviation training with SwAF pilots from the 21st UH-60 Black Hawk Helicopter Wing and the Gripen OT&E division.
“I was happy about the Marine Corps supporting this engagement because, by its nature, they are integrated; they are a small ‘armed forces’ in itself and they’re good at it,” said Engström.
Currently, SwAF UH-60 Black Hawk missions consist of only casualty evacuation (CASEVAC) support; the course taught and practiced FAC (A) and CAS for the first time in Swedish military history to these airframes.
A Forward Air Controller, or sometimes known as a “Joint Tactical Air Controller,” is an element of Close Air Support that coordinates attack elements and ensures accurate fires on the intended target while mitigating fratricide. Guidelines for standardization, qualifications and experience are standardized by NATO joint publications and used by coalition nations that support real-world overseas contingency operations. A FAC (Airborne) takes the role of the ground-based JTAC and operates on a fixed-wing aircraft or helicopter.
“The rotary wing is very good at assault support, the JTAC is good at controlling air but not at any part has the airborne asset controlled fires and supported the ground combat element from the wing side,” added, Haire, a Bakersfield, Calif., native.
The course introduced concepts of basic rotary and fixed-wing employment, artillery observation, NATO guidelines and standards for joint publications. Flight simulators were used to familiarize concepts to the SwAF pilots with the last week being the “flight phase” of practical, real-world applications on the SwAF UH-60 Black Hawk and Saab JAS-39 Gripen fighter jets in Linkoping’s training airspace.
“This training is important because it further integrates their capability; it is an absolute combat force multiplier and the Marine Corps matches these guys well; we’re both very small, everyone knows each other, and both are a middle-weight fighting force,” said Haire.
The Marine Corps' size and capacity is one of the world's leading examples of a small organization with the ability to pack a hard punch. The Corps is the smallest service of the United States Armed Forces but leads as the nation's crisis response force while supporting contingency operations in every clime and place. But being able to adapt to land, air and sea requires more than just capability; it requires integration of these elements with a mutual understanding of how to exploit each advantage, work as a team, and accomplish the mission.
This is the reason the Swedish Air Force's Operations, Training and Evaluation unit invited Marine Corps aviators from Marine Aviation Weapons and Tactics Squadron One to introduce Forward Air Controller (Airborne) capabilities to their pilots for the first time in Swedish military history. The course, supported by U.S. Marine Corps Forces Europe, also introduced Close Air Support operations to the newly adopted Swedish UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters.
Based on his experiences in the special operations community, Maj. Stefan “Rambo” Engström recognized the capability a FAC(A) can bring to military operations and started the process back in 2005 after he joined the Swedish Air Force as a pilot. “This is a brand new profile for us; we’ve never done this before,” said Engström, the FAC(A) program director for the SwAF Operations, Tactics and Evaluations division. The request through Marine Forces Europe was coordinated with MAWTS-1 around 2009 to introduce FAC(A) and engage with the Swedish Air Force OT&E division.
“Being a qualified Joint Tactical Attack Controller and doing those duties helped me recognize the value of having a CAS-player above me that has full understanding of air and land integration. We are a small air force and this program will increase our CAS capability; having this training will help us perform much better work and support to our ground unit.”
MAWTS-1’s overall mission is to standardize Marine aviation throughout the Corps and conduct weapons and tactics instructor courses. Every year, through numerous fleet-support trips, MAWTS-1 provides pre-deployment training and high-level certifications through academic instruction and real-world flight applications to units throughout the U.S. and abroad, as well as two main Weapons and Tactics Instructor courses a year. Subject matter experts also attend joint-service conferences throughout the year to develop and evaluate new doctrine, tactics and procedures.
“We have every functional area of aviation, not only ‘wing’ assets but support, including ground, JTACs, and FACs,” said Capt. Nels “Derelict” Dahlgard, a subject matter expert for FAC(A) UH-1 division, MWATS-1. “If there is ever any issue in terms of integration, we basically have the subject matter experts who serve as the basis of standardization at MAWTS-1 there with us,” added the Seattle, Washington, native.
The Marine Corps, being the nation’s crisis response force, understands the importance of integration for operational efficacy and mission accomplishment while being small, with troop numbers almost a third of their sister services; the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Army and the U.S. Navy. “Bringing that to the pilots over here, not only the FAC(A) mission but also the integration, and getting all the different parts and people talking and working together, that’s been great.”
The engagement featured two airframes: the SwAF UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter and the Saab JAS-39 Gripen fighter jet. The Black Hawk is a new airframe to the SwAF, being adopted by the service within the past couple of years and already supporting operations for coalition militaries.
“It is eye-opening! The UH-60 is a versatile aircraft because it can be conditioned very easily to conduct FAC(A); since they are not really a CAS platform, I think them being able to transition from assault support to doing FAC(A) is very important.”
The Saab Gripen is the flagship fighter jet of SwAF because of its effectiveness, value, and advantages gained from hallmarks of Swedish engineering. Many other NATO countries have fitted this airframe to increase aviation capacity of their militaries to also include the Royal Thai Air Force, the U.K.’s Empire Test Pilot School, and South African Air Force, with numerous potential operators in the future.
Both airframes have been players in support to overseas contingency operations to include Operation Odyssey Dawn, Libya, in 2011 and current casualty evacuation support to the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, with some members of this iteration deploying within months after this engagement.
“I am very confident that the right choice was for the Marine Corps to come out here and do this because we’re the only service that has an established rotary wing FAC(A) program,” said Capt. Thomas “Grape Ape” Duff, AH-1W Cobra FAC(A) subject matter expert, MAWTS-1. “The Marine Corps has this piece down because we have our own organic aviation combat and ground combat elements and we integrate.”
The Marines and Swedish found common ground in being a small force with wide operational capability; the Swedish military is small in numbers but support many operations with modern tactics and operations. Their contribution to the ISAF and overseas contingency operations across the globe calls for interoperability between their air, land and sea service components due to restraints in numbers.
“With bigger forces (USAF, US Army and US Navy), they are really good at what they do but they’re two different elements; in the Marine Corps, we are one and we fight as one,” said Duff. “There’s a full understanding of who you’re supporting; the infantry on the ground.” “I picked up on how small the Swedish force was and with a smaller force, it’s easier to integrate,” said Duff. “If they fight a war, they have to come together and fight as one.”
This bi-lateral engagement was an example of efforts to bolster capacity for interoperability between partner and allied nation’s militaries with U.S. Marine Corps Forces Europe in the U.S. European Command area of responsibility. “The thought of Marine Corps troops requiring CAS and a Gripen showing up on-station or a Swedish Black Hawk controlling fires in-and-around Marines drives us to make sure they are good at what they do,” said Duff.
“At our level, when you work with other services, you build friendships because you have a bond; you both joined the military for the same reasons,” added Duff. “It’s important to have allies and work with other countries and it has been awesome; we both think tactics, we both love serving our country, and we both love flying. I hope the Marine Corps continue to take the lead on integrating with foreign services because they could be providing CAS for Marines on deck one day.”
The training engagement will be used by the SwAF Gripen OT&E division, to evaluate the concepts and operational requirements before deciding whether or not to further implement it into SwAF aviation training. The Gripen OT&E division is the team of SwAF aviators responsible for conducting training, creating procedures, and standardizing aviation doctrine throughout the Swedish Air Force.
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta CAS/BAI. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta CAS/BAI. Mostrar todas las entradas
jueves, 7 de noviembre de 2013
lunes, 6 de febrero de 2012
Esa idea moderna del CAS.-
Que yo no digo que un A-29 o un AT-6 no lo hagan, y bien, pero es que parece que nos volvemos locos inventando una rueda que ya existía tiempo atrás. Es evidente que la doctrina aérea evoluciona, quizás solo algo más lenta que la moda femenina, pero los profesionales deberíamos preguntarnos si es necesario gastar lo que estamos gastando en desarrollar aviones y conceptos, cuyos fundamentos ya tenemos en el fondo del cajón, y que sólo la industria pretende mostrar como lo más de lo más.
Nos quejamos, yo el primero, del dineral que cuesta evolucionar un Rafale, un Tifón o un Lightning, que representan la cúspide tecnológica de vanguardia en aeronáutica militar, y aceptamos lo otro como el divino maná caido del cielo. Es cierto que no todo en la Fuerza puede ni tiene que ser "pata negra", negrísima, y también son necesarios, imprescindibles, diría yo, elementos sencillos que sirvan para realizar unas funciones específicas dentro de un margen de costos contenidos. Pero si es sencillo, es barato; y si es sencillo y barato es porque prescinde de complejos sistemas, y aquellos de los que no prescinde ya están en el mercado a disposición del cliente. Conviene recordar que entre las quejas que alegaba Beechcraft, cuando fue derrotada por Embraer en el Programa LAS de la USAF, es que llevaba invertidos más de 100 millones de dólares para que su AT-6 cumpliese los requerimientos del concurso.
Nos quejamos, yo el primero, del dineral que cuesta evolucionar un Rafale, un Tifón o un Lightning, que representan la cúspide tecnológica de vanguardia en aeronáutica militar, y aceptamos lo otro como el divino maná caido del cielo. Es cierto que no todo en la Fuerza puede ni tiene que ser "pata negra", negrísima, y también son necesarios, imprescindibles, diría yo, elementos sencillos que sirvan para realizar unas funciones específicas dentro de un margen de costos contenidos. Pero si es sencillo, es barato; y si es sencillo y barato es porque prescinde de complejos sistemas, y aquellos de los que no prescinde ya están en el mercado a disposición del cliente. Conviene recordar que entre las quejas que alegaba Beechcraft, cuando fue derrotada por Embraer en el Programa LAS de la USAF, es que llevaba invertidos más de 100 millones de dólares para que su AT-6 cumpliese los requerimientos del concurso.
PD: Otro ejemplo de solución brillante para un problema inexistente, podemos encontrarlo en la adquisición en 2002, por parte de las fuerzas especiales estadounidenses, de un fusil de asalto del calibre 7´62x39 que pudiesen utilizar en los combates que realizaban en el interior de las cuevas donde se ocultaban los terroristas y de ese modo poder utilizar la munición y los cargadores de Kalashnikov capturados al enemigo, consiguiendo combatir durante más tiempo sin necesidad de ser municionados. La solución planteada pasó por adquirir un número indeterminado, a un precio desconocido, del fusil Knights Armament SR-47, un arma específicamente desarrollada para cubrir esta necesidad. Quizás hubiese bastado con comprar algunos de los Kalashnikov AK-47 que en perfectas condiciones, e idénticos a los usados por el enemigo, circulan a miles por el planeta.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)